Please note: Throughout Classical New Jersey Society reviews some words are found preceded by an asterisk (*). This indicates that the word is defined or discussed in the IOW (In Other Words) section of our website. If you are looking for a special definition or discussion, click on the alpha-clickbar below or the actual word, if it is hyperlinked.

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H-I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P-Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X-Y-Z

Haydn in Hidin' Solid pianism
Sunday, December 7, 2003
By Henry Wyatt

Arbor Chamber Music Marcia Weinfeld, violin Richard Goode, piano Mozart: Sonata for violin and piano in A Major, K. 526; Beethoven: Piano Sonata no. 26 in E flat, op. 81 ("Farewell"); Janácek: Piano Sonata "October 1, 1905"; Brahms: Sonata for violin and piano in G major, op. 78. Presbyterian Church, Westfield.

Only ten years ago Richard Goode's Beethoven sonata cycle on Nonesuch recordings was released, the first ever by an American pianist. Suddenly, at age fifty, this consummate chamber musician, much respected for his intelligent and penetrating musicianship, had become both a soloist and a Beethoven pianist of the first rank - a very successful mid-life career change indeed. More solo recordings followed, all to great critical acclaim. Defining Mr. Goode as a pianist isn't easy. His Beethoven persona may seem elusive, compared to, say, the late Wilhelm Kempff, who, with Olympian dignity and pellucidity of gesture, surveyed the sonatas from the summit of great age and experience for Deutsche Grammophon in the 1960s. Russian-trained pianists such as Vladimir Ashkenazy and Evgeny Kissin see Beethoven as Romantic, and play him with more flamboyance and technical brilliance. Historicists such as Paul Badura-Skoda, Malcolm Bilson and Melvyn Tan perform these stalwarts on period instruments. And from on high, the shade of Artur Schnabel yet hovers.

Mr. Goode is none of these. His musicianship has always rested in his ability to have the music speak for itself, finding the right balance between inner detail and overall design. In his rightly celebrated Nonesuch cycle, multiple hearings, preferably with earphones and scores in hand, will reveal all the fastidiously-rendered subtleties of articulation, rhetorical gesture and tempo change that lie underneath his surface restraint.

These attributes were evident when Mr. Goode played Beethoven's so-called Lebewohl ("Farewell") Sonata for Arbor Chamber Music's concert of December 7th. He knows the difference between the recording studio and the public venue, and made the necessary adjustments: not quite so self-effacing, reaching out more to the tangible listener. Beethoven's heroic gestures were more striking. The bold octaves in the outer movements pealed like bells. Nonetheless there were Mr. Goode's sensible tempos, the careful probing and shaping of inner motives and textures, rendering this familiar work not so much the usual monument to Beethoven's heroic period but rather a more immediate, human utterance.

Mr. Goode's performance of Janácek's Sonata October 1, 1905 was in a similar spirit. Most of us are accustomed to the Moravian composer's acerbic dissonances and choppy, speech-derived rhythms. But this work is more reflective, commemorating a student killed during that revolutionary year in eastern Europe, protesting against Hapsburg domination of historic Bohemian and Moravian homelands. This softer aspect of Janácek was revealed in Mr. Goode's meditative approach, letting the rhetorical gestures of grief emerge as if by their own efforts.

Mr. Goode was joined by his wife, violinist Marcia Weinfeld, for two joint offerings. In Mozart's A-major violin sonata, K. 526, there were surprises aplenty in the rhythmic stresses that created unexpected metric patterns, sudden shifts from broad lyricism to brilliant figuration, highlighting Mozart's constantly changing inventory of musical topics.

In general, when paired with a pianist of this eminence, Ms. Weinfeld's comparatively narrow expressive range and somewhat thin tone placed her at a disadvantage. Her technique was also less than sparkling.

Nonetheless her change of persona in Brahms' G-major violin sonata indicated an appropriate musical discernment. In the opening movement her tone was more concentrated, with more intense vibrato, against Mr. Goode's more open, translucent probing of Brahms' musical fabric. Lyric episodes, especially in the slow movement, were straight from the heart, undisguised by artifice. In the finale, *moderato was the operative word, a judicious choice of tempo that let stand the right balance between the piano's disquieted skittering and the violin's steady lyricism. Not quite perfect together, but two intelligent musicians, striking the right balance between the transparent and the opaque, so often the hallmark of Brahms' later works.

When this recital was originally announced, the bill included Haydn piano sonatas. This listener looked forward to hearing Mr. Goode illumine at least a small part of this most neglected body of great music. Maybe next time.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

 

Wide expressive range
An insomniac hears a goldfinch at dawn

Monday, December 8, 2003
By Paul M. Somers

Colonial Symphony, Raymond Wojcik (guest conductor), Eugenia Zukerman (flute), Richard Foley (oboe). Canning: Fantasy on a Hymn by Justin Morgan; Vivaldi: Flute concerti in G minor, op. 10, no. 2 ("La notte"), and in D major, op. 10, no. 3 ("Il gardelino") ; Sampson: Concerto for Oboe and Strings (premiere); Dvorák: Serenade in E major, op. 22. Community Theatre, Morristown.

Those who were able to attend the Monday evening concert, hastily rescheduled to make up for the snowed-out Saturday original date, got a good dose of lyrical American music. The highlight was the premiere of David Sampson's Concerto for Oboe and Strings in Three Movements, which will doubtless (and rightly) be simply called his Oboe Concerto. It is a work which should definitely have a future, for it is one of Sampson's most lyric works, as ingratiating for the soloist as it is to the ear. While it requires a fine oboist, and the music is certainly modernist in its uses of advanced harmonies and lines, it is so well understood by the listener at first hearing that it acts as an invitation to find more.

Strictly speaking, it is not an "oboe" concerto, for the central movement, originally composed for a Tenebræ service, is played on english horn. While some instrumentalists have no problem switching between different versions of their instruments (B-flat clarinetists readily make the change to E-flat, flutists switch to piccolo with barely a thought, and trumpeters often have an arsenal of instruments lined up), oboists are not fond of changing to english horn without some time to relax their embouchure so they can get set for the new one. But veteran New Jersey oboist Richard Foley had no trouble at all and produced a moving account of the gorgeous melody. The more sprightly, though quite lyrical, outer movements were made all the more effective by the inclusion of the central lament.

This work should be taken up by more oboists. After all, quality concertos for them are not in abundance, and here is one they'll love to play.

The other American music on the concert was Thomas Canning's lush Fantasy on a Hymn by Justin Morgan. The same 18th century New England man who bred the famed Morgan Horses also wrote hymn tunes. His style sounds very much like that of William Billings, his contemporary. Conductor Raymond Wojcik had the tune played by itself before playing Canning's Fantasy. This was enormously helpful, for the piece itself, though lush and quite attractive, is written for two string quartets and string orchestra, a complex texture.

Canning, who composed mostly choral music and taught theory at the Eastman School of Music, admitted to being inspired by Vaughan Williams' Fantasy on a Theme of Thomas Tallis, wanting something comparable based on an American theme. He was entirely successful, and produced yet another work which could be programmed instead of the incessant Barber Adagio. The latter really is great, but enough already! Canning's Fantasy and Walker's Lyric are, frankly, just as good. So thanks to Mr. Wojcik for bringing it before the public.

The guest of the evening was the renowned flutist, author, and TV personality Eugenia Zukerman. She and Wojcik had what seemed to be a real collaboration. Some of the little details beyond merely keeping soloist and orchestra together were delicious. In "La notte" (The night), there could be no mistake about the ominous view of the dark - no moonlit vistas here. This was the world of the insomniac, and the emphasis on the lower voices kept it dark. Zukerman, of course, made the most of her chance to be expressive.

But her most bravura moments were reserved for the finale of "Il gardelino" (The goldfinch). Here she got to produce a baroque picture of a bird, a natural for the flute. She dazzled the audience.

The somewhat unsung hero of the Vivaldi portion of the evening was harpsichordist Gerald Rank. His continuo work was exemplary, but his most public music was in his effective improvisation on the *lute stop as the accompaniment to the slow movement of the second concerto. Bravo!

The concert concluded with Antonin Dvorák's rightly famous Serenade for strings. Here, finally without soloists or complicated forces with which to contend, we could hear the level of expressivity that Wojcik brought to the orchestra. The conducting and playing were shapely, sometimes sensuous, and sometimes dance-like. The orchestra had a wider *dynamic scope than they have exhibited for many concerts, and this opened to them a palette of sound possibilities which Wojcik exploited and that we hope future guest conductors will keep available.

Throughout the concert we were dismayed at the insecurity of the concertmaster in a program filled with solo playing in both Canning and Vivaldi.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

 

Feet in two worlds
Bartókian Korean

Friday, December 12, 2003
By Paul M. Somers

Cho-Yeon Bak (violin), Eunmi Lee (piano). A Musical Feast of Korean and Western Cultures. Doing-Il Sheen: For my family; Geon-Young Lee: Violin Sanjo; Vaughan Williams: The Lark Ascending; Vittorio Monti: Czárdás; Ernest Chausson: Poème, op. 25; Copland: Hoe-down from "Rodeo." Puffin Cultural Forum, Teaneck.

The Puffin Cultural Forum did what it does best: it challenged audiences with juxtapositions. The main event, if you will, was a violin and piano recital by Cho-Yeon Bak and Eunmi Lee respectively. But it was held within an art exhibit with a message of peace for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The visions and voices of moderates from both sides set up deep resonances with a recital by Koreans, whose nation is even more severely partitioned and more filled with political enmity, if that is possible.

Part of the underlying problem in the Palestinian-Arab community also was inadvertently demonstrated in the recital: the takeover of another culture by Western Culture at levels far below the transient surface. It was quite apparent that violinist Bak was far more comfortable playing the Western music than the Korean works she chose.

It's not that the Korean works were more difficult - they weren't; or that the music is less interesting - it was what most of us came to hear, though Geon-Yong Lee's unaccompanied Violin Sanjo was far more interesting than Doing-Il Sheen's For My Family with its American-style accompaniments.

All five movements of the latter are folk-tune related and all set sweetly. The four outer movements are like photos: "The Day of Reunion", "Autumn 1988," "Winter Night", "And New Year." The central "Song" is a lovely *ABA work. But with the accompaniments sounding at times like salon music, the evocation of folk elements was not very successful. Both players played the music accurately, if without a great deal of conviction.

The unaccompanied work was very different indeed! Composed in an edgy post-Bartókian style. It was always intense, whether fast or slow. The piece progresses from "Fast and fiercely" in a lessening of tempo with each movement until the final is "Very slowly." This last has the most "Asian" feel to it with *bent pitches and *pizzicatos redolent more of plucked folk instruments than of modern conservatory training.

Most striking to my taste was the next-to-last movement, "Slowly." Here the left hand, the one on the fingerboard, plucks the open G string while other elegiac material is bowed. It sounded like a tolling bell.

For all the strengths of the piece, there were some intonation problems which were patently not a matter of bending notes.

When both artists returned, it was to present a Western work: Ralph Vaughan Williams' mystical The Lark Ascending. Its *pentatonicism made a great transition between the Asian to the Western parts of the evening. Immediately Bak's playing took on more authority, even in the delicate tracery of Vaughan Williams' transparent vision. Conservatory training was apparent with each bow-stroke.

Following intermission we heard three more works from the Western tradition, music now played with all the conviction missing from "For My Family," music with superb intonation and phrasing.

Vittorio Monti's good old Czárdás, Ernest Chausson's equally well-known Poème, and a spiffy arrangement of Aaron Copland's "Hoe-Down" from Rodeo found both players in familiar territory. Ms. Bak's *double stops were accurate and exciting. And if in the small and not very resonant hall, she tried to play so softly that she couldn't get her very highest pitches to speak easily in the Poème, it did not matter, so eloquent was the rest of the performance.

It was all too easy to guess that the energy and style of the Copland hoe-down was a sign of what went wrong with the Korean works. Ms. Bok certainly convinced me that she has become thoroughly Americanized.

Who am I with my strictly WASP credentials to lecture her? But allow me to suggest to her that the unaccompanied piece by Lee is as worth learning as accurately as anything else on the program. And let me suggest that For My Family, if taken more seriously, could really become a series of musical snap-shots worth sharing.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

 

"Mother Mary comes to me." "My soul doth magnify the Lord"
Saturday, December 13, 2003
By John Hammel

Harmonium Choral Society, Anne Matlack (conductor). "Ave!" Ave Marias, Magnificats and other Hymns to Mary from Josquin to Lauridsen, Pärt to Parsons. Church of the Redeemer, Morristown.

Harmonium's musical program presented composers from the Middle Ages to the present day, with often thrilling results and only occasional stumbles, of choral and song offerings in praise of the Virgin Mary. One of Harmonium's assets is a relatively smooth choral blend with a straight or white vibratoless sound that impels the music forward and provides an intensity to the musical shape and phrasing. Their dynamics are finely tuned and coupled with exemplary diction, no matter what language they are singing in, and Ms. Matlack generally achieves good balance with her forces, conducting in a fluidly organic manner that aids in providing aptly idiomatic renditions of the disparate styles on display. The lapses were few and spaced far enough apart not to hamper the pleasure to be found in this program. More than on any other occasion when I have heard this choir, I found a few moments of imbalance which took me by surprise. The soprano section had a tendency to push their sound to the point of sharpness, most notably earlier in the program and once or twice towards the end. I found the men had a tendency to over-enunciate the final syllable of the word "Maria", especially in Morten Lauridsen's Ave Maria, which resulted in the tone moving from the front of the *mask to the back of the throat, hence altering the musical line.

Harmonium has acquired a reputation for a high level of professionalism and consistency as well as their ability to take on challenging works, no matter how knotty or rhythmically convoluted. Where they fall down consistently is in Ms. Matlack's choice to draw her soloists from the ranks of the choir. Whether this is from political or financial necessity, combinations of both, or for reasons entirely of another nature, it diminishes the effect of high professionalism which otherwise permeates the ensemble.

A good choral singer is a thing of beauty unto itself and one to be cherished. The ability to sublimate one's ego and work on blend and the good of the whole over the individual is a wonderful characteristic.

A soloist is an animal of an entirely different nature. It requires years of study of placement, projection, and dramatic interpretation that is totally different than that required of a chorister. The twain hardly ever meet. And with one or two exceptions they didn't meet in this concert, as Ms. Matlack, again drew her soloists from within the ranks of the choir with varying results. If she wishes the group to be accepted on the highest plateau of performing choral ensembles, I believe she needs to address this issue.

With the above caveats out of the way, there was still much to enjoy at this concert. The evening began with a note perfect rendition of Robert Parson's Ave Maria. Diction and balance were exemplary; pitch was spot on; cut offs were perfect; and the contrapuntal lines were woven seamlessly. The choir brought unified timbre to Morten Lauridsen's setting of Ave Maria. Anton Bruckner's Tota pulchra est was a richly dramatic reading.

They exhibited exemplary diction in Benjamin Britten's A Hymn To The Virgin, a work written when he was a seventeen year old student. This is a macaronic text (utilizing both Latin and English) from about 1300 that employs *modal harmonic structure and spare *dissonances which the choir easily executed with very effective gradations of dynamics leading to well-shaped phrases. This was the most finely sculpted performance of the first half of the concert. Herbert Howell's A Spotless Rose was imbued with a sense of ebbing and flowing phrases that coupled with super diction, thus providing a beautifully compelling flow to the outstanding melody.

The performance of Arvo Pärt's Magnificat was disappointing. His music is surprisingly difficult because of the seeming ease with which one hears its construction. He lingers over a single note or phrase, building his thematic material with triads and silences within one tonality. Yet it all exposes singers or instrumentalists mercilessly. Breaths must be taken with exactitude or the music comes off with weakened flow. The harmonies are close and dense, and the choir found it difficult to tune the chords at times. *Piano singing was less exact than *fortissimo, and I found the soprano soloists not employing enough breath support to maintain purity of line.

Harmonium and Ms. Matlack were back on much firmer ground in the first half closer, Franceso Durante's magnificent Magnificat. The string orchestra was everything to be expected in this music, with finely honed playing that provided apt support and nuance to the soloists and choir. The lack of first class soloists showed most in this piece but was more than compensated for by the rousing energy and conviction on the part of the choir. They sang with robustness and drive, outstanding blend. These virtues were coupled with superb phrasing, crisp diction and musical phrasing that was well nigh perfection.

The Harmonium Chamber Singers opened the second part of the concert and were featured on four numbers, two of which were settings of There Is No Rose. The first setting was the familiar medieval carol, and the second one by John Joubert, born in 1927. Both settings favor transparency to illuminate the words, and the chamber singers handled the medieval text well, though with some minor lapses in the duet portions of the arrangement.

The Joubert setting utilized *rounds, and had denser and more interesting harmonies. The Chamber singers sang exquisitely in their two other featured numbers, Josquin's four voice Ave Maria, bringing out the delicacy of the music, with the *canon, sung by the tenor and soprano parts, a sublime highlight. Their final feature, Gottfried Homilius' Ich freue mich, was spirited and employed *dotted Baroque runs that tickled the ear.

The choir's tour de force performance of the evening was Totus Tuus by the Polish modernist Henryk Gorecki. His music is extremely dense but highly listenable due to his affinity for the folk and religious music of his background. His music opens softly and slowly, like petals on a ripened flower, and this mystical feeling was brought out fully by the accurate and excellent rendition of the now full Harmonium chorus. They brought the resolutions within the thematic material to divine fruition through the smooth shaping of the chord progressions. Ann Matlack conducted with her usual flair and a perfervid passion that conveyed itself to both chorus and audience. A wonderful, wonderful performance.

As has become somewhat customary with Harmonium concerts, they offered somewhat lighter but no less rigorous fare, to change the mood and let the audience go home tapping its toes, as it were. This show was no exception with the five final selections; the West Indian spiritual, The Virgin Mary Had A Baby Boy, rhythmically precise and crisply sung; Durme, durme, a Sephardic folk tune arranged by Alice Parker, a melodious blend of Arabic, Jewish, and Spanish influences sung with fine attention to the intricate inner rhythms; Hombe, a Kenyan lullaby arranged by Laz Ekwueme, and sung sumptuously by alto, Laura Kosmich and the choir; and Steven Sametz's Gaudete!, a dynamic and complex piece that unfortunately suffered from muddiness as the quick tempo shifts caused the choir to spin it's wheels a bit. Yet there was still enough offered on the positive side, to elicit vigorous applause as the final chords reverberated and died away in the rather fine acoustic of Church of the Redeemer.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

 

Mature composing, mature artistry
A high-level faculty on display

Saturday, December 13, 2003
By Paul M. Somers

Thurnauer Chamber Music Society: Richard Goldsmith (clarinet), Laura Koepke (bassoon), Daniel Grabois (horn), Deborah Buck, Sharon Roffman (violins), Kathryn Lockwood, Daniel Panner (violas), Yari Bond (cello), Peter Weitzner (double bass), Mendelssohn: Viola Quintet, Op. 87; Schubert: Octet for Strings and Winds, Op. 166, D. 803.  Eric Brown Theater, JCC on the Palisades, Tenafly.

 Two late works, one by Mendelssohn and one by Schubert, unveiled what many consider the pinnacle of 19th century romanticism.  The audience was filled with families, including many young music students come to witness their teachers performing.  This is a regular condition at the Thurnauer School in Tenafly where the faculty includes highly respected and even well-known artists.

            The six movements of the Schubert were, of course the “big work,” not only because of its length but because it is filled with the sonic variety of an orchestra.  Indeed, it was this very aspect which marked the performance: tight sectional ensemble and blending of sounds were the prime virtue.  Solos by all concerned were at the high level one has come to expect from this group over the years, but it was the evocation of symphonic mass rather than transparency that made an impression.  This is not to say that the playing was clunky or over-heavy - far from it - but that this was a performance with grand scope and the power to sustain it.

            Mendelssohn’s Op. 87 viola quintet, while far more transparent by virtue of its smaller size, was also clearly written by a composer used to orchestral writing.  The sensibility is not that of the familiar Mendelssohnian færie but of full humanity.  The “Scherzando” was played with a laid-back whimsy, and the lyricism of the *“Adagio e lento” was spun out with careful shaping.

            The finale lived up to its marking as *“Allegro molto vivace.”  But it was not manic, instead focusing on a very human positive energy which drove the players along.  Certainly the music is by a man who had found his way to a place in life where lithe spirits did not habitually intrude.  But it was the virtue of the players that they gave the music the gravity it deserves.

 


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

 

 

This year's Messiah.
Clarity and consistency
December 19, 2003
By Don Martone

Masterwork Chorus and Orchestra Andrew Megill, (conductor), Laura Heimes (soprano), Alexandra Montano (mezzo-soprano), David Vanderwal (tenor), Sumner Thompson (baritone). Handel: Messiah (1761 Dublin version). Community Theater, Morristown

If you are like me, you tend to view the year from one Christmas to the next. I know New Year's Day is in there, but that seems like an add-on to me.

Also, if you're like me, a Messiah performance is a required part of the season. Indeed, it's a holiday tradition. It goes without saying that the Masterwork Chorus and Messiah are indelibly linked. The long performance tradition of this organization is a given. In fact the group's 200th performance was as far back as 1998. However, it helps to insert a bit of a twist in tradition from time to time.

Starting last year conductor Andrew Megill began to explore some of the other versions of Messiah that differ from the more or less standard version we were offered in the past. Starting this trend with the 1743 Covent Garden version, Megill seemed to be announcing a new beginning. A soprano version of "Comfort ye" and "Every valley"(most familiarly for tenor) made us sit up in our seats and take notice.

This year, the version selected was the one from 1761 in Dublin. Though in many ways not as openly adventurous as last year's, it contains some interesting variants. No, not the 12/8 "Rejoice," but it does contain the duet version of "How beautiful are the feet" leading into the rarely heard "Break forth into joy" chorus. Also, a *recitative version for tenor of "Their sound is gone out" (usually heard as a chorus), a soprano and alto recitative of "O death where is thy sting" (most often heard as a full duet for soprano and tenor) are featured.

Of course, this would all be academic if the performance were not at a high level but this year's combination of soloists, chorus and orchestra under the leadership of Andrew Megill may have been the most consistently satisfying in recent memory.

Soprano Laura Heimes, mezzo-soprano Alexandra Montano, tenor David Vanderwal, and baritone Sumner Thompson formed the fine solo quartet with no individual standing out above the others, but forming instead a finely matched group. *Ornamentation was not ostentatious nor overdone and was appropriate.

The Masterwork Chorus has never sounded better. The males of the chorus, who in the past have been the weak link, have now improved markedly. They are more evenly blended and sing with a fuller tone than in the past. I'm sure this reflects the efforts of Mr. Megill. In addition, the clarity of enunciation during *melismatic passages for the whole chorus has improved and hints of much work in this area.

If asked to characterize the performance, I would say it reflected taste and refinement. It seemed effortless.

By my count there are about ten versions of Messiah. So if Megill continues this tradition of a different version each year, it may not be long before we get to hear Mozart's reworking of Messiah. Now that would really be something to look forward to.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

 

A farewell to Christmas. "Pipes" with mixed emotions.
Annual "Wow!" experience
Saturday, December 20, 2003
By Paul M. Somers

The Clan Currie Society presents "The Pipes of Christmas." Susan Porterfield Currie (narrator); Evan Thomson Cattanach, Frederick C. Clark (readers); Tom Roche (tenor), Mark Delavan (baritone), Jeffrey H. Rickard (piano, organ); Jennifer Port (Scottish harp); Local Hero; Solid Brass; New Jersey Youth Chorus, Patricia Joyce (director); R. P. Blandford and Sons Pipe Band, Matt Nonnemacher (director). Presbyterian Church, Summit.

The day after the "Pipes of Christmas" concert I attended the holiday open house of some friends. I barely had my coat off when a voice emerged from somewhere near the punch-bowl, another friend named Dave: "Paul, wasn't that the best concert ever?"

I didn't have to ask to what concert he was referring. Just to be honest, I did demur a bit; the word "ever" was over the top for this concert-goer who still can hear a Brahms Second at Saratoga in 1967 by Philadelphia, the Mahler Third of the NJSO, and the Schubert Cello Quintet with Mostly Music back in the days when they were in the Westfield Baptist Church. Those were transcendent performances. But I understood Dave's enthusiasm. I also knew that our host Ed had planned to attend the "Pipes" concert but had decided he couldn't with the open house the next day. So as Dave and I "reviewed" the concert with Ed listening avidly there was about it a sense of ribbing him for not attending.

We described in detail how the opening of the concert is always hair-raising. A solo piper begins playing Highland Cathedral at the back of the nave, then walks slowly down the aisle. As he comes closer to the front he is joined by Solid Brass with a prominent timpani part, then by organ, and in a final layer of sound by four more pipers and four drummers from the R. P. Blandford and Sons Pipe Band for Redlands, California. Even the non-Scots in the full house were thrilled.

But there was a bitter-sweet touch to this year's proceedings. Pipe Major Kevin Ray Blandford, who had been that solo piper since the inception of the "Pipes" concert, had recently passed away far too early, losing a fight with cancer. It was he who developed much of the music with organist Jeffrey Rickard, also from Redlands. Matt Nonnemacher, who marched down the aisle this year, has stepped into the leadership role of the Pipe Band, and his playing showed he deserves it.

The concert is very much a Christmas event with readings from the Bible and from Celtic writers all supporting the music. Clan Currie Director Robert Currie, who produces the event, keeps as many "Pipes" traditions alive as he can, yet also likes to add new things so the concert does not become stale over time. Of course there was Met lead baritone Mark Delavan wearing his Clan Johnston tartan. His annual singing of "Baloo, Lammy" with incomparable fiddler Paul Woodiel was an expected highlight.

This year tenor Tom Roche joined the ensemble, singing among other things the "Wexford Carol" with another newcomer, the New Jersey Youth Chorus. Both were up to the excellent standard set in past years and by the returning artists.

There was the singing of "Amazing Grace," surely the best-known *pentatonic melody in the western world, with Delavan and the pipes providing uncommon power. This year of course had extra meaning as the hymn's frequent use at funerals reminded us again of Mr. Blandford's absence.

The first audience favorite, one which Dave and I set before Ed with glee, was the "Hymn to the Savior." To be sure, it begins with a plaintive, hymn-like quality of very Celtic origin. But soon it turned into (as old hands knew it would) a lively foot-stomping duel between flutist Christopher Layer and fiddler Woodiel. The toes were tapping audibly in the audience as well.

Another tradition the audience awaited was Evan Thomson Cattanach's reading of the Christmas story from Luke. A man from the Highlands, he read it in Scots dialect, which set many a heart beating with nostalgia. Moving south and west of Scotland, Frederick C. Clark read from Dylan Thomas's A Child's Christmas in Wales as he began with the opening of the narrative poem, then jumped seamlessly to the very end, keeping the mood while skipping the story episodes.

No "Pipes" concert would be the same without Susan Porterfield Currie as the narrator. She has a voice that David and I agreed would even entice us to hear her read a phone book. All the transitions, the glue which hold the wonderfully sprawling celebration of pan-ethnicity together, were delivered with care and assurance.

O Holy Night is hardly Scottish or any kind of Celtic. But when Delavan, backed up quite effectively by the New Jersey Youth Chorus, sang the famous piece it transcended any background. The soloist sang a climactic high A-flat, which incongruously reminded the listener that he regularly sings big Verdi and big Wagner. Then he took up a guitar and led the singing of "Silent Night" in the most authentic manner. It had, after all, been originally written as a song to be accompanied by guitar because the parish organ was broken.

"O Come All Ye Faithful" began with organ, then in came Solid Brass fully living up to its name, and finally the pipers. Even those who knew what was next had a "wow!" experience. That ended the religious portion of the evening.

What was next was the entrance of the drummers and the rousing and very secular annual finale Scotland the Brave. Every tartan in the Presbyterian Church, be it full kilts (many), or sash and scarf (there was my wife wearing her Clan Grant), or something in a plaid pattern from L. L. Bean, glowed extra bright at that moment. Even people named "Pulaski" or a very English "Somers" had their spirits raised by the collected energy of the evening and that final march.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

Welcome to New Jersey
Choral variety sung very well
Saturday, December 20, 2003
By Barbara Thomson

Antioch Chamber Ensemble, Joshua Copeland (conductor), James Little, organist. An Antioch Christmas.
Calvary Episcopal Church, Summit

Suffering from holiday stress and overload as I arrived for Antioch Chamber Ensemble's Christmas concert, I was really not in the mood to listen to anything, much less a group I had never heard of. I settled grumpily in my seat in Calvary Episcopal Church's lovely, albeit chilly, sanctuary and was prepared to be annoyed.

Then the first notes of Morten Lauridsen's instantly recognizable harmonies drifted up from the rear of the sanctuary: the O Magnum Mysterium. The intonation was pure, the blend exquisite, the voices ethereal in the church's sympathetic acoustics. As the group of 12 singers processed up the aisle, ending with a gorgeous pianissimo, I went from frazzle to transcendence in a mere three minutes.

The Antioch Chamber Ensemble, most of whose youthful members graduated from Westminster Choir College, has been in existence since 1997. They look like what you would call a madrigal group: they stand in a semi-circle, sing mostly a capella (at least on this occasion), and are discretely conducted by their director, Joshua Copeland. But their repertoire goes farther than madrigals, even into works written for large chorus, although the madrigal ideal of one or two persons on a part and a lot of eye contact and interaction between singers is indeed their style.

Their clear, English boy-choir sound worked well in the repertoire chosen for that night: music by British, French, and American composers with an emphasis on the Brits.

The first half of the program consisted of unaccompanied works, some arrangements of familiar carols, and Christmas anthems. Two selections from Poulenc's Un soir de neige contained the unusual turns of phrase and harmony one expects from him, and three carol-anthems by Herbert Howells featured beautiful flowing lines, with fine attention to *dynamic ebbs and swells and the always-present impeccable tuning. I could be picky about the sometimes clipped ends of phrases, but to some extent that is part of that style of choral singing - just something I personally find too abrupt.

A particularly interesting and haunting work was an arrangement of the Coventry Carol by New Jersey's Steven Pilkington - pungent quartal harmonies accompanied by 7 high-pitched handbells rung softly by the singers (with a nice *four-in-hand by Copeland). Late in the first half it provided a welcome change of texture.

They began the second half of the concert by again processing through the church - this time down the side aisles and up the middle - to an arrangement of Ding Dong Merrily on High. The main work on this half was five of the seven movements of Benjamin Britten's A Boy was Born. A work of stark, even austere, intensity, it featured crystalline solos by soprano Kate Mulvihill and intonation so pure you could hear the *beats between women singing in *seconds. I must say I didn't understand a word they were saying (a problem that cropped up now and then in other works ) but I didn't really mind - in this piece it made the involvement in the purely musical elements that much more intense.

The rest of the program was accompanied on organ by Calvary's Music Director, James Little. The audience was invited to sing along in three familiar carols. Then Antioch sang a John Rutter arrangement of their namesake, the hymn-tune Antioch, (better-known to most as "Joy to the World") which featured a lively, well-played running accompaniment on the organ.

John Gardner's arrangement of Tomorrow Shall Be My Dancing Day had an interesting setting with drums and tambourine, and the program closed with Ring Out Ye Crystal Spheres - the last movement of Ralph Vaughan Williams' Christmas oratorio Hodie.

I had misgivings as to whether a work written for full orchestra and chorus would translate well to twelve singers and organ, but it did. The standing ovation from their clearly enraptured audience was rewarded by a setting of that old chestnut - The Christmas Song ("Chestnuts roasting on an open fire"). Johnny Mathis would have loved it.

The Antioch Chamber Ensemble is clearly an exceptional group, but tweaking a few things would have helped the program. Spoken commentary on the pieces was often unintelligible (to me, anyway, sitting about half-way back) as the church's acoustics, which favor singing, don't favor clear speaking. While it was fine to include some audience singing in the old familiar carols, it felt like a big ending, and it wasn't the end yet. It would have made a nice ending for the first half, however, which suffered a little from sameness of texture. Perhaps that's like complaining that a string quartet always just sounds like four players, but the program could have used a little more oomph, especially in the first half. They have to look out for the temptation to be too pure, almost bordering on the effete. Still, what they do they do very, very well. If you have a chance to hear them, go!


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents

 

OPINION

The Sublime and Sublimity
(Excerpted by the editor from a longer, more detailed article)

By Henry Wyatt

The ancients taught that eloquence had three purposes: docere, conciliare, movere was common to the three rhetorical genres, and was considered the principal function of oratory. To do this, the so-called elevated style was employed, as it dealt with the profoundest topics: virtue, nobility of the soul, the good, and their corresponding opposites.

Aristotle's categories of virtue taught that they were perceivable even in natural phenomena including animals and inanimate objects. This attitude was inherited by his Enlightenment successors. Thus, a mountain prospect or a tall forest grove can be described as noble, and can stir our emotions.

Classic rhetoricians taught that the elevated style, with its topics, figures and tropes, could move an audience to such an extent that their very souls were transported to elevated realms of thought and feeling. When this effect was worked upon the audience, they experienced the sublime.

At this juncture it is important to say that the sublime is not mere strong emotion. To be sure, powerful emotions can be produced, to which the audience succumbs: when Mimì dies at the end of La Bohème we may be reduced to tears; at a rock concert we may be bludgeoned into submission by driving rhythms and sound levels exceeding 100 decibels, and enjoy every minute of it. In neither case are we transported beyond our own selves to view that which makes us seem insignificant (Kant's definition of the sublime); no elevated style is involved, drawing us upward; no sophisticated quality and combination of artifice are employed by the musicians or recognized by the listeners. Kant reminded his readers that love is beautiful but not sublime. The beautiful and the sublime are distinct categories.

Grandeur of thought is Longinus' first source of sublimity. So we must consider - especially in high-volume pop music and rock - that there is often a lack of rhetorical and textural clarity which would permit us to relish artifice and exercise our most refined faculties of judgment. To be fair, not all art aims at the sublime or needs it, and sublimity is not necessarily a barometer of artistic quality. Different genres have different purposes and techniques, and the pleasures they afford are genuine enough, even if not sublime.

Sublime transport was described by some classic rhetoricians. Quintilian spoke of oratory that struck the listeners with the force of a thunderbolt. But it was an obscure Greek writer, Longinus (about whom nothing is known), whose rhetorical treatise, On the Sublime (1st century CE), defined the sublime as a literary æsthetic as well as a rhetorical style. "Sublimity," Longinus wrote, "is the note which rings from a great mind," and "the soul is raised by true sublimity, it gains a proud step upwards, it is filled with a joy and exultation, as though itself had produced what it hears." Additionally, and to a greater degree than other writers, he stressed a natural or supernatural component beyond what the elevated style contains, to produce the sublime. Nature planted sublimity in the soul of the orator and has provided him with the genius that transports the listener beyond himself, "not to persuasion but to ecstasy that passages of extraordinary genius carry the hearer", with immediate, marvelous and lasting effects.

Longinus became widely known to the European men and women of letters when Boileau's translation was published in 1674. Within a few decades it became a fashion; within a century, the prevailing æsthetic.

By then critical thought had moved beyond Longinus. Burke separated the sublime from the beautiful, and subdivided it into the sublimes of obscurity and of terror.

This is an important aspect of sublimity: the experience that occasions it is more æsthetic than actual. The latter paralyses the mind, whereas the former is pleasing. Pleasure derives not from the experience itself but from the powerful emotions it produces. To feel the complete working of the sublime, the listener (or reader, or viewer) must be alert to be transported by employing it. Sublimity is thus created not only from the thing being described, but from within the elevated minds and natural gifts of both speaker and listener.


Return to CNJS Home Page | Return to Reviews Table of Contents